Carotid interventions (CEA and CAS) in acute stroke patients: which procedure on which patient.

Treatment of carotid bifurcation disease in patients presenting with acute stroke has been a controversial issue over the past four decades. Classically, patients were asked to wait four to six weeks before intervention was entertained in order for the brain to stabilize and the risks of intervention to be minimized. Unfortunately, up to 20% of patients will have a secondary event after their index event and the window of opportunity to save potentially salvageable ischemic tissue will be missed. Early reports had demonstrated poor results with intervention. However, more recently, institutions such as ours have demonstrated excellent results with early intervention in patients who present with stable mild to moderate stroke with an NIH stroke scale less than 15 and preferably less than 10, present with stroke and ipsilateral carotid artery lesion of 50% or greater. Also more recently, we have been aggressively treating patients with larger ulcerative plaques even if the stenosis approaches 50%. In our and others experiences, patients who are treated at institutions that have comprehensive stroke centers (CSCs) where they have a multidisciplinary system that consists of vascular surgeons, neuro interventionalists, stroke neurologists, specifically trained stroke nursing staff and a neuro intensive ICU have had optimal results. Early assessment, diagnosis of stroke with recognition of cause of embolization is mandatory but patient selection is extremely important; finding those patients who will benefit the most from urgent intervention. Most studies have demonstrated the benefit of carotid endarterectomy in these patients. More recent studies have demonstrated acceptable results with carotid stenting, especially in smaller lesions, those less than 1.2 centimeters. Early intervention should be avoided in most patients who are obtunded or with an NIH stroke scale greater than 15 or who do not have any "brain at risk" to salvage. These patients may be better served by being treated medically and the small group of patients that do have some improvement may benefit from interval intervention.

Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: endovascular program development and results.

Improvements in endovascular technology and techniques have allowed us to treat patients in ways we never thought possible. Today endovascular treatment of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms is associated with markedly decreased morbidity and mortality when compared to the open surgical approach, yet there are several fundamental obstacles in our ability to offer these endovascular techniques to most patients with ruptured aneurysms. This article will focus on the technical aspects of endovascular aneurysm repair for rupture, with particular attention to developing a standardized multidisciplinary approach that will help ones ability to deal with not just the technical aspects of these procedures, but also address some of the challenges including: the availability of preoperative CT, the choice of anesthesia, percutaneous vs. femoral cut-down approach, use of aortic occlusion balloons, need for bifurcated vs. aorto-uniiliac stentgrafts, need for adjunctive procedures, diagnosis and treatment of abdominal compartment syndrome, and conversion to open surgical repair.

Strategies to improve spinal cord ischemia in endovascular thoracic aortic repair: Outcomes of a prospective cerebrospinal fluid drainage protocol.

PURPOSE: Although endovascular repair of thoracic aortic aneurysm has been shown to reduce the morbidity and mortality rates, spinal cord ischemia remains a persistent problem. We evaluated our experience with spinal cord protective measures using a standardized cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) drainage protocol in patients undergoing endovascular thoracic aortic repair. METHODS: From 2004 to 2006, 121 patients underwent elective (n = 52, 43%) and emergent (n = 69, 57%) endovascular thoracic aortic stent graft placement for thoracic aortic aneurysm (TAA) (n = 94, 78%), symptomatic penetrating ulceration (n = 11, 9%), pseudoaneurysms (n = 5, 4%) and traumatic aortic transactions (n = 11, 9%). In 2005, routine use of a CSF drainage protocol was established to minimize the risks of spinal cord ischemia. The CSF was actively drained to maintain pressures <15 mm Hg and the mean arterial blood pressures were maintained at >/=90 mm Hg. Data was prospectively collected in our vascular registry for elective and emergent endovascular thoracic aortic repair and the patients were divided into 2 groups (+CSF drainage protocol, -CSF drainage protocol). A chi(2) statistical analysis was performed and significance was assumed for P < .05. RESULTS: Of the 121 patients with thoracic stent graft placement, the mean age was 72 years, 62 (51%) were male, and 56 (46%) underwent preoperative placement of a CSF drain, while 65 (54%) did not. Both groups had similar comorbidities of coronary artery disease (24 [43%] vs 27 [41%]), hypertension (44 [79%] vs 50 [77%]), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (18 [32%] vs 22 [34%]), and chronic renal insufficiency (10 [17%] vs 12 [18%]). None of the patients with CSF drainage developed spinal cord ischemia (SCI), and 5 (8%) of the patients without CSF drainage developed SCI within 24 hours of endovascular repair (P< .05). All patients with clinical symptoms of SCI had CSF drain placement and augmentation of systemic blood pressures to >/=90 mm Hg, and 60% (3 of 5 patients) demonstrated marked clinical improvement. CONCLUSION: Perioperative CSF drainage with augmentation of systemic blood pressures may have a beneficial role in reducing the risk of paraplegia in patients undergoing endovascular thoracic aortic stent graft placement. However, selective CSF drainage may offer the same benefit as mandatory drainage.

Establishing a protocol for endovascular treatment of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms: outcomes of a prospective analysis.

PURPOSE: In our transition from elective abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) to emergent ruptured AAA (r-AAA) repair with endovascular techniques, we recognized that the availability of endovascularly trained staff in the operating rooms and emergency departments, and adequate equipment were the limiting factors. To this end, we established a multidisciplinary protocol that facilitates endovascular repair (EVAR) of r-AAA. METHODS: In January 2002, we instituted a multidisciplinary approach that included the vascular surgeons, emergency department physicians, anesthesiologists, operating room staff, radiology technicians, and availability of a variety of stent-grafts to expedite EVAR of r-AAAs. Five patients with symptomatic, not ruptured AAAs suitable for EVAR underwent simulation of patients presenting to the emergency department with r-AAAs. Emergency department physicians alerted the on-call vascular surgery team (vascular surgeon, vascular resident or fellow) and the operating room staff, emergently performed an abdominal computed tomography (CT) scan in only hemodynamically stable patients with systolic blood pressures > or =80 mm Hg, and transported the patient to the operating room. The vascular surgeon informed the operating room staff to set up for EVAR and open surgical repair in an operating room equipped with interventional capabilities. The operating room setup was rehearsed with the anesthesiologists, operating room staff, and radiology technicians who were knowledgeable of the sequence of steps involved. Since then, 40 patients have undergone emergent EVAR for r-AAAs with general anesthesia. RESULTS: No complications developed in any of the symptomatic (simulation) patients, and 40 (95%) of 42 patients with r-AAAs had a successful EVAR with Excluder (n = 27, 68%), AneuRx (n = 9, 23%), or the Zenith (n = 4, 10%) stent-grafts. The mean age was 73 years (range, 54 to 88 years), and pre-existing comorbidities included coronary artery disease in 26 (65%), hypertension in 23 (58%), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in 7 (18%), renal insufficiency not on dialysis in two (5%), and diabetes in nine (23%). Fourteen (38%) patients were diagnosed with r-AAAs at another hospital and subsequently were transferred to us, and 26 (62%) presented directly to the emergency department at our institution. At the initial presentation, 30 patients (75%) were hemodynamically stable and either had a CT scan at an outside hospital or in the emergency department, and 10 (25%) hemodynamically unstable patients with systolic blood pressures <80 mm Hg were rushed to the operating room for EVAR without a preoperative CT scan. The mean time from the presumptive diagnosis of a r-AAA in the emergency department to the operating room for EVAR was 20 minutes (range, 10 to 35 minutes), and the mean operative time from skin incision to closure was 80 minutes (range, 35 to 125 minutes). Seven patients (18%) needed supraceliac aortic occlusion balloon, and six (15%) needed aortouniiliac stent-grafts. The mean blood loss was 455 mL (range, 115 to 1100 mL). Two patients each (5%) developed myocardial infarction, renal failure, and ischemic colitis, seven (18%) developed abdominal compartment syndrome, and seven (18%) died. Over a mean follow-up of 17 months, three patients with endovascular r-AAA repair required four secondary procedures. CONCLUSIONS: The early results show that emergent endovascular treatment of hemodynamically stable and unstable patients is associated with a limited mortality of 18% once a standardized protocol is established. There is an increased recognition of emerging complications with an endovascular approach, and a synchrony of disciplines must be developed to initiate a successful program for endovascular treatment of r-AAAs.

Combined carotid endarterectomy and coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with asymptomatic high-grade stenoses: an analysis of 758 procedures.

PURPOSE: Surgical treatment of hemodynamically significant carotid artery stenoses has been well documented, especially in the asymptomatic patient. However, in those patients presenting with hemodynamically significant asymptomatic carotid artery disease who are to undergo cardiac surgery, optimal treatment remains controversial. In this study, we analyze our experience with patients who underwent synchronous carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and coronary artery bypass graft procedures (CABG) for hemodynamically significant (>70%) asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis and coronary artery disease (CAD). METHODS: Demographics and outcomes of all patients undergoing synchronous CEA/CABG for asymptomatic carotid stenosis between April 1980 and January 2005 were reviewed from our vascular registry and patient charts. We included patients who underwent standard patching of their carotid artery and those undergoing eversion CEA. All neurologic events within the first 30 days that persisted >24 hours were considered a stroke. For purposes of comparison, we also reviewed outcomes for patients undergoing synchronous CEA/CABG for symptomatic carotid stenosis. RESULTS: Asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis (>70%) was the indication in 702 patients (276 women and 426 men) undergoing 758 CEAs. In the asymptomatic group, 22 patients, of which 21 succumbed to cardiac dysfunction, and one died from a hemorrhagic stroke. The overall mortality rate was 3.1%. Seven permanent nonfatal neurologic deficits occurred in this series (1 woman, 6 men). The combined stroke mortality was 4.3%. This compares to a 30-day stroke mortality of 6.1% in 132 symptomatic combined CEA/CABG patients. The difference in stroke mortality in women compared with men was not significant. CONCLUSION: In this experience, patients presenting with hemodynamically significant (>70%) asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis can undergo synchronous CEA/CABG with low morbidity and mortality.

Factors associated with abdominal compartment syndrome complicating endovascular repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms.

BACKGROUND: Endovascular treatment of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (r-AAAs) has the potential to offer improved outcomes. As our experience with endovascular repair of r-AAA evolved, we recognized that the development of abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) led to an increase in morbidity and mortality. We therefore reviewed our experience to identify risk factors associated with the development of ACS. METHODS: From January 2002 to December 2004, 30 patients underwent emergent endovascular repair of r-AAA by using commercially available stent grafts. All patients who developed ACS underwent emergent laparotomy. Physiological and clinical parameters were analyzed between patients with and without ACS after endovascular r-AAA repair. RESULTS: Over the past 3 years, 30 patients underwent endovascular r-AAA repair, and 6 (20%) patients developed ACS. Patients with ACS had a higher incidence of the need for aortic occlusion balloon (67% vs 12%; P = .01), a markedly longer activated partial thromboplastin time (128 +/- 84 seconds vs 49 +/- 31 seconds; P = .01), a greater need for blood transfusion (8 +/- 2.5 units vs 1.8 +/- 1.7 units; P = .08), and a higher incidence of conversion to aortouni-iliac devices because of ongoing hemodynamic instability and an inability to expeditiously cannulate the contralateral gate (67% vs 8%) when compared with patients without ACS. The mortality was significantly higher in the patients with ACS (67%; 4 of 6) compared with patients without ACS (13%; 3 of 24; P = .01). CONCLUSIONS: ACS is a potential complication of endovascular repair of r-AAA and negatively affects survival. Factors associated with the development of ACS include (1) use of an aortic occlusion balloon, (2) coagulopathy, (3) massive transfusion requirements, and (4) conversion of bifurcated stent grafts into aortouni-iliac devices. We recommend that, after endovascular repair of r-AAA, these patients undergo vigilant monitoring for the development of ACS.

Safety and efficacy of eversion carotid endarterectomy for the treatment of recurrent stenosis: 20-year experience.

Current options for treating recurrent carotid stenosis (RCS) include standard longitudinal arteriotomy and patch angioplasty with or without carotid endarterectomy (s-PCEA), carotid-carotid bypass, or carotid angioplasty and stent (CAS). Eversion carotid endarterectomy (e-CEA) is an effective procedure for treating primary carotid stenosis, yet it has not been reported for treating RCS. We evaluated the feasibility and outcome of e-CEA for treating of RCS in comparison to s-PCEA. The records of all patients undergoing elective CEA for symptomatic and asymptomatic high-grade RCS from January 1981 to July 2002 were reviewed. Although during the earlier period s-PCEA was performed preferentially, this paradigm changed to e-CEA being the preferred technique for treatment of RCS. During the course of postoperative follow-up when duplex sonography suggested high-grade RCS, the diagnosis was confirmed via arteriography. Data on cranial nerve injury, recurrent stenosis, stroke, and death were prospectively collected into a vascular registry database and analyzed retrospectively, Students' t-test and chi-square analysis were used to compare the group's baseline characteristics and outcomes. Over a 21-year period, 7001 patients underwent primary CEA for symptomatic (n = 2405, 34%) or asymptomatic (n = 4596, 66%) high-grade stenosis via standard (n = 1501, 21%) or eversion (n = 5500, 79%) techniques. Fifteen (25%) patients had 70 to 80% stenosis, 30 (51%) had 81 to 90% stenosis, and 14 (24%) had 91 to 99% stenosis. During this time period, 59 patients presented with symptomatic (n = 18, 31%) or asymptomatic (n = 41, 69%) high-grade RCS and underwent operative repair via s-PCEA (n = 22, 37%) or eversion (n = 37, 63%) techniques. The mean time interval for repeat carotid surgery for RCS was 49 months in the s-PCEA group and 48 months in the e-CEA group. Permanent cranial nerve injuries, stroke, and recurrent restenosis occurred in one (4.5%), one (4.5%), and one (4.5%) of the patients undergoing s-PCEA, respectively. In the e-CEA group, these events occurred in one (27%), none (0%), and one (2.7%) patients, respectively, There were no deaths during the 30-day postoperative period. Eversion CEA is a feasible option for the treatment of many RCSs and can be performed safely with a low rate of cranial nerve injury, recurrent stenosis, stroke, and death.

Does sac size matter? Findings based on surgical exploration of excluded abdominal aortic aneurysms.

PURPOSE: To prospectively examine the outcomes of excluded abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) that continue to expand without evidence of endoleak. METHODS: From 1984 to 1998, 1218 patients underwent operative retroperitoneal exclusion of AAA and aortoiliac reconstructions. During the procedure, the aneurysm sac was ligated proximally, as well as distally, which created an ideal in-vivo model of excluded AAA sacs with or without endoleaks. From January 2002 to June 2003, 15 of these patients were identified as having an increase in AAA sac size with or without an endoleak on duplex ultrasonography. These patients were prospectively evaluated by computed tomography and diagnostic arteriography. Patients with a demonstrable endoleak underwent embolization, and the remainder underwent open surgical exploration. RESULTS: Eight patients had arteriographically demonstrated endoleaks that were treated with coil embolization. The remaining 7 patients (6 men; mean age 76 years, range 68-81) without a demonstrable endoleak underwent elective surgical exploration and sac endoaneurysmorrhaphy. The mean time interval between the original surgery and aneurysm sac exploration was 76 months (range 52-92); during this time, the mean aneurysm sac size increased by 2.7 cm (range 1.3-5.2). The mean sac pressure was 53 mmHg, and the sac walls were noticeably thickened, with markedly dilated vasa vasorum. The sac contained yellow, fibrinous material with clear serous fluid (5 patients without any evidence of retrograde flow) or liquefied thrombus with serosanguinous fluid (2 patients with retrograde flow from lumbar arteries). No AAA sacs were pulsatile. CONCLUSIONS: Continued expansion of excluded AAA sacs can occur from causes other than a missed endoleak. Exudation of fluid from thickened sac wall and vasa vasorum, as well as local enzymatic activity, might lead to the formation of a sac hygroma. Furthermore, these findings raise questions as to the need for surgical exploration of all patients with an enlarging AAA sac in the setting of low sac pressures and no definable endoleak.

Infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm repair via endovascular versus open retroperitoneal approach.

The beneficial effects of open surgical abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair via a left retroperitoneal approach have been established. We compared the short-term outcome of infrarenal AAA repair via an endovascular approach with that of an open retroperitoneal approach. From October 2001 to April 2003, patients with infrarenal AAA >5 cm were offered repair via an endovascular approach (group I) with a variety of industry-made stent grafts or with an open retroperitoneal surgical approach (group II). Data were prospectively collected in the vascular registry and complications were analyzed. Data comparison between the two groups was done by using chi-squared analysis and two-tailed Students t-test. Statistical significance was identified at p < 0.05. Over an 18-month period, 492 patients underwent evaluation for AAA. Of these, 446 patients had infrarenal AAA and underwent either endovascular (group I: n = 175, male 85%, female 15%) or open surgical repair (group II: n = 232, male 74%, female 26%) via a left retroperitoneal approach. Group I patients had a higher incidence of coronary artery disease (66% vs. 35%, p < 0.05), hypertension (74% vs. 43%, p < 0.05), chronic obstructed pulmonary disease (29% vs. 12%, p < 0.05), and diabetes mellitus (20% vs. 7%, p < 0.05), a lower mean amount of intraoperative blood loss (277 cc vs. 1452 cc, p < 0.05), and shorter length of stay in the hospital (1.7 days vs., 7.3 days, p < 0.05). Group I also had fewer complications of myocardial infarction (1.7% vs. 5.2%, p = NS), renal failure (0% vs. 2.6%, p < 0.05), pulmonary failure (1.7% vs. 2.6%, p = NS), ischemic colitis requiring colectomy (0.6% vs. 2.6%, p < 0.05), multisystem organ failure (0% vs. 1.3%, p = NS), and death (0.6% vs. 1.3%, p < 0.05). Despite increased preexisting comorbidities, patients undergoing endovascular aneurysm repair had less morbidity, mortality, and blood loss and a shorter in-hospital length of stay than patients undergoing open surgical aneurysm repair via a left retroperitoneal approach.

Outcome of popliteal artery aneurysms after exclusion and bypass: significance of residual patent branches mimicking type II endoleaks.

PURPOSE: Popliteal aneurysms (PAs) often are treated with exclusion and bypass. However, excluded aneurysms can transmit systemic pressure from persistent flow through collateral arteries (endoleak), resulting in aneurysm growth and rupture. We used duplex ultrasound scanning for postoperative surveillance more than 2 years after PA repair with exclusion and bypass, to determine the presence of flow and aneurysm growth. METHODS: From 1995 to 2001, 23 patients with 26 PAs (mean diameter, 3.2 cm; range, 1.6-5.6 cm) underwent surgical repair and were available for more than 2 years of follow-up. The popliteal artery was ligated proximal and distal to the aneurysm, and autogenous revascularization was performed. All patients who underwent PA endoaneurysmorrhaphy through a posterior approach were excluded from the study. During long-term follow-up, aneurysm sac flow and size were evaluated with duplex ultrasound scanning, computed tomography, or magnetic resonance angiography, and standard angiography. Patients with increased PA size and persistent flow were offered repair through a posterior approach. RESULTS: Over 7 years, 26 PAs (symptomatic, 11; asymptomatic, 15) treated with aneurysm exclusion and bypass were available for more than 2 years of follow-up (mean, 38 months; range, 24-78 months). In the postoperative period 16 PAs (62%) became thrombosed, 10 (38%) had persistent collateral flow through geniculate vessels, 6 (23%) increased in size, and 3 (12%) ruptured; 1 (4%) resulted in limb loss. Operative findings for all ruptured PAs and 3 of 6 PAs with increased sac size that underwent aneurysm sac exploration and endoaneurysmorrhaphy revealed retrograde flow through geniculate vessels, mimicking type II endoleak. CONCLUSIONS: These findings question the effectiveness of PA exclusion through proximal or distal ligation and bypass. In addition, retrograde flow into the aneurysm sac (ie, type II endoleak after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair) may transmit systemic pressure that can result in aneurysm rupture. We recommend PA treatment with aneurysm sac decompression and ligation of geniculate vessels whenever possible and routine postoperative surveillance of the excluded aneurysm sac.

Effects of bilateral hypogastric artery interruption during endovascular and open aortoiliac aneurysm repair.

PURPOSE: Hypogastric artery interruption is sometimes required during aortoiliac aneurysm repair. We have not experienced some of the life-threatening complications of pelvic ischemia reported by others. Therefore we analyzed our experience to identify factors that help minimize pelvic ischemia with unilateral and bilateral hypogastric artery interruption. METHODS: From 1995 to 2003, 48 patients with aortoiliac aneurysm required interruption of both hypogastric arteries as part of endovascular (n = 32) or open surgical (n = 16) repair. During endovascular aneurysm repair coils were placed at the origin of the hypogastric arteries, and bilateral hypogastric artery interruptions were staged at 1 to 2 weeks when possible. Open surgery necessitated oversewing or excluding the origins of the hypogastric arteries and extending the prosthetic graft to the external iliac or femoral artery. Collateral branches from the external iliac and femoral arteries were preserved, and patients received systemic heparinization (50 units/kg). RESULTS: There was no buttock necrosis, ischemic colitis requiring colon resection, or death with the bilateral hypogastric artery interruption. Initially buttock claudication developed in 20 patients (42%), but persisted in only 7 patients (15%) at 1 year. New onset of impotence occurred in 4 of 28 patients (14%), and there were no neurologic deficits. CONCLUSIONS: Bilateral hypogastric artery interruptions can be accomplished with limited morbidity. When hypogastric artery interruption is needed during endovascular aneurysm repair, certain principles help minimize pelvic ischemia. These include hypogastric artery interruption at its origin to preserve the pelvic collateral vessels, staging bilateral hypogastric artery interruptions when possible, preserving collateral branches from the femoral and external iliac arteries, and providing adequate heparinization of the patient during these procedures.

Analysis of factors contributing to improved outcome for carotid endarterectomy.

Since carotid endarterectomy was revitalized following the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial and Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study, results have improved. However, types of carotid endarterectomy, indications, risk factors, surgical factors, techniques, and other treatment modalities may be associated with outcomes of carotid endarterectomy. The purpose of this study was to identify those factors in a broad-based carotid endarterectomy patient. This study involved review of the data from 3,644 patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy in New York State hospitals. A multivariate statistical model was used to identify significant patient risk factors to examine the association of the process of care and surgical factors, including surgical specialty for outcome of carotid endarterectomy. In-hospital death and stroke rate overall was 1.84%. After adjustment for patient risk factors, specific processes of care, such as eversion endarterectomy, protamine, heparin, or shunt, were associated with lower adverse outcomes relative to patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy without these processes. Similarly, patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy by vascular surgeons had lower adverse outcomes compared to neurosurgeons and general surgeons. This retrospective review showed that processes of care and surgical specialty were significant factors that contributed to outcomes following carotid endarterectomy.

Outcome of aggressive surveillance colonoscopy in ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm.

PURPOSE: Emergent repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (rAAAs) is associated with high perioperative morbidity and mortality. One of the significant complications of this surgery is bowel ischemia. Reports detail mortality as high as 80% when this condition is realized. The objective of this project was to determine both the incidence and the effect of mandatory postoperative colonoscopy on outcome of colon ischemia after rAAA. METHODS: From July 1995 to September 2002 all patients with an rAAA who underwent emergent aortic reconstruction were included in this review. All colonoscopies were performed within 48 hours, ischemia was graded consistently, and treatment was initiated per protocol based on grade of ischemia. Patients with grades I and II ischemia were followed up with medical management and repeat colonoscopy. All patients with grade III ischemia underwent bowel resection. Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative variables were collected to assess possible independent risk factors for and predictors of bowel ischemia. RESULTS: Eighty-eight patients underwent emergent aortic reconstruction because of rAAA in the study period. Their mean age was 73 years, and 64 patients (72%) were men. Operative mortality was 42%. Eighteen percent of patients died within 24 hours, and 24% died between 1 and 30 days after surgery. Colonoscopy was performed in 62 of 72 patients who survived more than 24 hours. Bowel ischemia was documented in 26 of the 72 patients (36%). Of these, 16 patients had grade I or grade II ischemia at both initial and repeat endoscopy. Nine patients underwent exploratory laparotomy with bowel resection because of grade III ischemia; two procedures were performed because of worsening ischemia discovered at repeat colonoscopy. In patients with colonoscopic findings of bowel ischemia the mortality rate was 50% (13 of 26 patients). In those with grade III necrosis who underwent resection the mortality rate was 55%. Elevated lactate levels, immature white blood cells, and increased fluid sequestration were all variables associated with the occurrence of colon ischemia. CONCLUSIONS: Bowel ischemia is a frequent postoperative complication (42%) of repaired rAAA. Performing mandatory surveillance colonoscopy in these patients may be associated with a decrease in overall mortality and improved survival in patients with transmural bowel necrosis with no comorbid condition.

Early carotid endarterectomy after acute stroke.

PURPOSE: Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) after acute stroke is generally delayed 6 to 8 weeks because of fear of stroke progression. This delay can result in an interval stroke rate of 9% to 15%. We analyzed our results with CEA performed within 1 to 4 weeks of stroke. METHODS: Records for all patients undergoing CEA after stroke between 1980 and 2001 were analyzed. Perioperative evaluation included carotid duplex scanning or angiography, and head computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging. All patients with nonworsening neurologic status, additional brain territory at risk for recurrent stroke, and severe ipsilateral carotid stenosis underwent CEA. Patients were grouped according to time of CEA after stroke: group 1, first week; group 2, second week; group 3, third week; group 4, fourth week. Statistical analysis was performed with the chi(2) test, logistic regression, and analysis of variance. RESULTS: Two hundred twenty-eight patients underwent CEA within 1 to 4 weeks of stroke. Perioperative permanent neurologic deficits occurred in 2.8% of patients in group 1 (72 procedures), 3.4% of patients in group 2 (59 procedures), 3.4% of patients in group 3 (29 procedures), and 2.6% of patients in group 4 (78 procedures). There was no relationship between location or size of preoperative infarct and time of surgery. Only preoperative infarct size correlated with probability of neurologic deficit after CEA (P <.05). CONCLUSION: Incidence of postoperative stroke exacerbation is similar at all intervals. The results are within acceptable limits for treatment of symptomatic carotid stenosis. CEA may be performed within 1 month of stroke with similar results at all intervals during this period.

Outcome of concomitant renal artery reconstructions in patients with aortic aneurysm and occlusive disease.

The question remains as to whether patients presenting with aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD) or abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) have similar outcomes when concomitant renal artery reconstructions are performed. In this study, we analyzed our experience with simultaneous aortic and renal reconstructions using a retroperitoneal approach. Over a 5-year period, all patients with either AAAs > 5 cm or symptomatic AIOD who were found to have high-grade renal artery stenosis and who underwent aortic reconstructions with concomitant renal revascularization were analyzed through our vascular surgery registry. Morbidity and mortality were quantitatively evaluated. Data were analyzed using the chi-square test. A total of 1,133 patients with AAA (n = 832) and AIOD (n = 301) underwent aortic reconstructions. Two hundred thirty-one patients had 283 concomitant renal revascularizations, including bypass, reimplantation, and endarterectomy, for high-grade (> 70%) renal artery stenosis via a left retroperitoneal approach. The mortality rate of AAA repair with and without renal revascularization was 2.3% (4/178) and 1.5% (10/654), respectively, and that of aortobifemoral bypass for AIOD with and without renal revascularization was 5.7% (3/53) and 2.8% (7/248), respectively. Of the 7 deaths in patients requiring aortic and renal reconstructions, 4 occurred in patients with bilateral renal revascularization. Transient renal insufficiency, ischemic colitis, and cardiopulmonary failure occurred in 5.6%, 2.2%, and 9.6% of patients with AAA repair and in 5.7%, 0%, and 9.4% of patients with AIOD. Two patients developed acute occlusion of their renal bypasses; one was successfully revised, whereas the other led to a nephrectomy. In patients with AAAs, AIOD, and high-grade renal artery stenosis, simultaneous aortic and renal reconstructions can be performed through a retroperitoneal approach with a limited and acceptable mortality. With concomitant renal and aortic procedures, patients with AIOD have a higher mortality when compared with those with AAAs, although this difference is not statistically significant.

Upper extremity bypass grafting for limb salvage in end-stage renal failure.

OBJECTIVE: Patients with end-stage renal failure and upper-extremity arterial occlusive disease sometimes have painful digital ulceration. We evaluated the efficacy of distal bypass grafting from the brachial artery for limb salvage in this setting. METHODS: All patients with end-stage renal disease with painful digital ulceration or gangrene of the hand seen from 1992 to 2002 were evaluated with clinical examination and noninvasive studies. Those with evidence of occlusive disease underwent conventional angiography. Individuals with forearm occlusive disease underwent bypass grafting, from the brachial artery to either the distal radial artery or ulnar artery at the level of the wrist or proximal hand. Follow-up was scheduled at regular intervals, and included duplex scanning. Limb salvage and bypass graft patency were determined with life table analysis. RESULTS: Over 10 years, 18 forearm bypass procedures were performed in 15 patients. The outflow artery was the radial artery in 15 procedures and the ulnar artery in 3 procedures. Bypass conduit was autogenous in all patients. No patient had a functioning arteriovenous fistula at bypass grafting; six limbs had previously occluded fistulas. Two bypass grafts (11%) occluded in the early postoperative period, with resultant progression of gangrene. In the remaining 16 grafts patency was maintained (mean follow-up, 18 months), with pain control and tissue healing. CONCLUSION: Treatment in patients with renal failure with upper extremity occlusive disease may be facilitated with brachiodistal bypass grafting. Pain control and reversal of progression of hand necrosis can be achieved.

Aortoiliac reconstruction: the retroperitoneal approach and splenic injury.

Exposure of the abdominal aorta through the left retroperitoneum is a well-accepted technique. Unfortunately, splenic injury is a complication of this approach that rarely occurs through a mid-line transabdominal incision. In this series we evaluate the occurrence of splenic injury during left retroperitoneal aortic surgery. The records of all patients undergoing abdominal aortic reconstruction via the left retroperitoneal approach were reviewed from 1988 to 2001. Indications included either abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) or aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD). Thoracoabdominal aneurysms and visceral aortic reconstructions were excluded. Those patients that required splenectomy for splenic injury were stratified and analyzed for demographics, indications for operation, and other complications. Chi-square analysis was used to determine statistical significance. Over the 13-year study period, 2889 aortic reconstructions were performed. These consisted of 1773 elective AAA repairs, 357 ruptured or symptomatic AAA repairs, and 759 aortofemoral bypasses for AIOD. Splenectomies were performed after aortic repair in 21 (0.7%) patients. Breakdown by indication totaled 11/1773 (0.6%) for elective AAA repair, 7/357 (2.0%) for rupture or symptomatic AAA repair, and 3/759 (0.4%) for AIOD ( p < 0.05). Mortality for patients undergoing elective AAA without splenectomy was 1.9% (34/1762) and with splenectomy was 9.1% (1/11), while it was 3.2% (24/756) for AIOD patients without splenectomy and 14% (1/7) for AIOD patients with splenectomy (all p = NS). Splenic injury can occur in elective and emergent aortic reconstructions performed through the left retroperitoneum. The surgeon should be prepared for splenectomy whenever intraperitoneal blood or hemodynamic instability is identified. Evaluation of the spleen prior to flank closure may be prudent.

Should ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms be repaired in the octogenarian?

PURPOSE: Several investigators have suggested a dismal prognosis of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA) repair in the elderly. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the morbidity and mortality of rAAA repair in octogenarians and compare it to that of a younger population. METHODS: From 1980 to 2000, all patients undergoing emergent rAAA repair were divided into two groups based on their age; Group I: age <80, Group II: > or =80 years. Outcomes were evaluated based on a Chi-square test and a P-value <0.05 indicated statistical significance. RESULTS: Over a 20-year period, 323 patients underwent rAAA repair through a left retroperitoneal (74%) or standard transperitoneal (26%) approach. In Group I (age <80 years) and II (> or =80 years), the overall 30-day mortality was 25 and 41% (P<0.05), respectively. Furthermore, the elderly population had a higher incidence of death due to myocardial infarction (15 vs. 7%), as well as non-fatal cardiac and cerebrovascular events (17 vs. 4%) when compared to the younger patients. CONCLUSION: Although the elderly patients have an increased risk of having cardiac and cerebrovascular events in the postoperative period, the treatment of rAAAs in these patients should not be any different than that of a younger population. The left retroperitoneal approach is feasible and beneficial for rAAA repair and is associated with a limited morbidity and mortality.

Eversion carotid endarterectomy: a technical alternative that may obviate patch closure in women.

PURPOSE: Recurrent carotid stenosis following standard longitudinal carotid endarterectomy (s- CEA), with and without patch angioplasty, effects the durability of the procedure and can lead to reintervention. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the incidence of restenosis following eversion carotid endarterectomy (e-CEA) in women. METHODS: The records of all patients undergoing elective carotid endarterectomy (CEA) for symptomatic and asymptomatic high-grade carotid stenosis over a 5-year period from July 1994 to June 1999 were reviewed. Eversion endarterectomy was performed preferentially under regional anesthesia in awake patients. Postoperatively, patients were routinely evaluated by duplex scans at 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and yearly thereafter. Hemodynamically significant restenosis (>70%) via duplex scans was confirmed by standard or magnetic resonance angiography. Student's t-test and Chi square analysis were used to assess statistical significance and assumed for P<0.05. RESULTS: Over this 5-year period, 3429 eversion carotid endarterectomies were done for symptomatic (female: 375, male: 573) and asymptomatic (female: 1091, male: 1390) high grade carotid stenosis. In the postoperative period 18 (0.9%) male and 12 (0.8%) female patients developed a permanent stroke (P = NS). Operative mortality was 0.6% (n = 12) in males and 0.5% (n = 8) in females (P = NS). Cranial nerve injuries, wound infections, and neck hematoma occurred in 7 (0.4%), 2 (0.1%), and 26 (1.3%) male and in 3 (0.2%), 3 (0.2%), and 15 (1.0%) female patients, respectively. Recurrent carotid stenosis greater than 70% via duplex scan (PSV >125 cm/s and EDV >100 cm/s) developed in 12 (1.0%) males and 15 (1.5%) females (P = NS). CONCLUSION: The eversion technique for CEA requires both the transection and anastomosis of the internal carotid artery at the carotid bulb, and appears to result in a low incidence of restenosis in women. This is a straightforward technique and obviates the need for primary closure of distal smaller caliber internal carotid artery that can lead to narrowing, and the use of patch closure that has its attendant risks.